The ubiquitous JPEG image format, while efficient for transferring visual data, harbors hidden vulnerabilities that malicious actors can exploit. Attackers construct sophisticated payloads that can be seamlessly embedded within seemingly innocuous JPEG files. When an unsuspecting user downloads such a compromised image, the embedded malicious code

Some applications allow for that code to execute, Some others Really don't. If the application doesn't help it, there must be a vulnerability present to execute. , not scripts having input from distant buyers, nor documents misnamed as .jpeg. The copy flagging I am responding to seems inadequate even for just a buzzword match; seriously practicall